ISWC · Musical Work

T-906290651-8

Codex

4 recordings

Last verified: February 16, 2026

The ISWC for “Codex” is T-906290651-8. ISWCs are ISO 15707 identifiers managed by CISAC; they identify the underlying song — its melody, lyrics, and arrangement — rather than any single recording. One composition can have many recordings (ISRCs). This work has 4 known recordings (ISRCs) indexed on Credits.fm.

Format

TPrefix

906290651Work number

8Check digit

Prefix:: "T" = musical work; "W" = work in progress.
Work number:: 9-digit unique work number assigned by CISAC.
Check digit:: ISO 7064 Mod 11-2 check digit that validates the rest of the code.

Credit Chain

ISRC4 recordings

ISWCCodex

What other identifiers does this connect to?

Songwriters/Publishers (IPI)

00178205758 00178205856 00178208847 00178209648 00178210867 00349356239

Creative Contributors (ISNI)

0000 0000 7841 2006 0000 0000 7841 284X 0000 0001 1075 3143 0000 0001 1444 1825

SourcesMusicBrainzNotesNotes CreditsMusicBrainzCISAC5 sources

Verified on

CISAC ISWC registry search

Identifier Graph

What is ISWC T-906290651-8?

T-906290651-8 is an International Standard Musical Work Code (ISWC) that uniquely identifies the musical composition “Codex”. ISWCs are defined by ISO 15707 and managed by CISAC. Unlike ISRCs which identify recordings, an ISWC identifies the underlying song — the melody, lyrics, and arrangement.

This work has 4 recordings (ISRCs) associated with it. Each recording represents a distinct version — such as the original, a remix, a live performance, or a cover — that shares the same underlying composition.

T-906290651-8

Format

What other identifiers does this connect to?

Verified on

People also ask

What is ISWC T-906290651-8?

T-906290651-8

Format

What other identifiers does this connect to?

Which releases contain this work? (18)

Recordings (4)

Who are the artists on this work?

Verified on

People also ask

What is ISWC T-906290651-8?

Which releases contain this work? (18)

Recordings (4)

Who are the artists on this work?